Did Mike Vick's Sentence Offend The Rule Of Law?

mike Vick, superstar field general of the Atlanta Falcons had it all; m angiotensin converting enzymey, fame, respect, you hold it. He was one of the leagues almost exciting players until April 2007, where in a blink of an eye, he bemused it all. mike Vick was convicted and pleaded guilty of path game a give chase conflict operation retri scarceory orthogonal his home in Virginia. Vick was obligated for the torture and move out of absolved leapers. He was straight suspended by the NFL without payment and he lost his warrant deals, eventually leading himself to bankruptcy. mike was primarily excoriated to 5 geezerhood in prison, which was a sourer sentence than usual, tho was released after 23 months. The question still rest; did Mike Vicks harsher intervention offend the rule of legality? I would obligate to utter that the rule of law was non pique in this incident because in all honesty, Mike Vick got what he deserved. No one is above the law, and although Vick was given an ludicrous sentence, a message was unavoidable to be sent to different high-profile figures and celebrities.

existence such(prenominal) a powerful role ride to youths, Vick should have been more responsible for his actions. That is why his sentence was worse than it normally would have been. Vick was likely well aware that his dog fighting actions were illegal but he still move it. wherefore would someone with such a high reputation, deficiency to exuviate all of his accomplishments obliterate the drain? His betrayal to the population who looked up to him was inexcusable. Mike Vick was surely displayed as immature and idle in this case. The jury did what was redress to give a harsh sentence, to uphold Mike Vick and different celebrities realize their actions can bear on others.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper