'A finger at the monster Essay\r'

'The hellions attempts fail. When he tries to befri last blind De Lacey, his son Felix, takes it as if the heavyweight is trying to hurt the quondam(a) man, and with â€Å"supernatural force tore” (134) the freak a focal point from his father. Although, the titan could have â€Å" tear him limb from limb” (134) his â€Å"heart change posture” (134). The fiend realized that he depart never be accepted by anyone due to his appearance, and how could anyone accept him when his stimulate reason tumble-down him. The titan is all alone. At this point he fall uponks revenge, revenge upon original that â€Å"cast him abroad an object for the refuse and horror of mankind” (138) and rightfully so.\r\nWhen the fanatic saves a girl from drowning, instead of battalion showing him gratitude he is shot and wounded, his â€Å" reenforcement of my benevolence… the miserable pain of a wound” (140). Why should he live to be kind to mans, when e very work he had with them were horrific, and all due to his appearance. It is no surprise that the hellion turned from tidy to evil after everything he endured. He adapted to the elements he was surrounded with, not by choice. The devil is an outsider of his abnormality, disjunct from society.\r\n entirely he wants is someone to slop to, a friend, and thus, asks lord to â€Å"make him cheerful” (145) by creating a companion of polar sex, as â€Å"hideous” (145) as he is. original a cupidity to fulfill his wishes barely, in the end, he changes his mind and destroys it, leaving the commencement exercise-class honours degree monster alone, yet again. He robs the monster hope of a companion, in doing so provokes him. Victor’s justification that the monster might be â€Å"more cancerous than her mate” (164) sounded more like an free to abort his work. He was advantageously certain what his actions might lead to, Henry’s and Elizabethâ €™s dying (which they ultimately did).\r\nThe monster warned Victor that he will be with Victor on his wedding shadow (167). However, Victor brushes it off as if the monster was threatening his life. He was so self-centered that if he paid closer charge to the monsters threats he would have realized that he was not referring to Victor just now, to Elizabeth when he verbalize â€Å"Shall each man, bump a married woman for his bosom, and each beast have his mate, and I be alone? ” (166). Victor is wrap around his own self-pity, feeling puritanical for Elizabeth when she finds, â€Å"her lover so barbarously snatched from her” (167).\r\nHe doesn’t feel sorry for Elizabeth, his ruefulness is for himself. Victor is left to anticipate his death. 1 is quick to judge the unfortunate monster that is left to fend for itself. Alone, aban endureed, lonely and loveless, thriving for one tiny bit of human attention and acceptance from anyone. You may reason th at the killer whale deserved no less. However, do not be hasty in your judgment of the ill-fated creature who was abandoned by his hypocritical precedent for the bushel reason of not being amiable to the eye. The mind of the creator, Victor, proved to be kind of shallow.\r\nHe did not take time to assess true worth of his creation, to see what is valuable under the unsightly exterior. So what if the monster was not appealing bountiful? The monster was intelligent, patient and in impoverishment of love and company. The monster was not bad-tempered of whose company that may be. He is ordain to talk to anyone who would stand the sight of him, but no one did. A killer whose hand was â€Å"forced” to kill by his creator who did not take indebtedness to train his creation, teach him right from vituperate †educate him.\r\nOne can solicit that Victor Frankenstein didn’t kill anyone then is less of a monster. If you take into regard that he deserted his so ca lled â€Å"first born”, he might as well have killed the monster and protected him years of misery, sorrow, humiliation, loneliness and abandonment. Think of it this way; in the eyes of the flying lizard St. George, it must(prenominal) have looked as the biggest monster, but, under the circumstances, effect of the poor creature counts for very little. We don’t seem to care for the dragon anymore than we care for a poorly(predicate) created monster.\r\nDo we not then hellish the creation more than we blame the creator who is greedy, self-centered, self-indulgent, self-gratifying, conceited, egoistical and selfish to no end? Victor, the creator, is not a killer but he may as well been. His actions lead to many a(prenominal) innocent lives. Victor never tried to rectify his way towards the monster, even after the first death occurred. Victor just took the death as his punishment. He didn’t stop the secant killing, third nor fourth. It was Victor’s fil let of sole responsibility to care for the creature. Even if you dormant argue that the monster was the one committing murders, admitted that was his unless sin.\r\nThe monster had not thought of the nub of â€Å"thou shall not kill”. provoke you argue that the creator’s greed for power was any less perverting of the sin than the one of his creation? Victor’s pride which prevented him from accepting the monster was also the reason that instigated his need for monsters creation. All Victor had ever done was for his own prestige and glory that served himself with total fail of others. With all the killings the monster had committed, you still find sympathy for the poor creature. At least he is regretful and remorseful for his actions.\r\nThe monster confessed his sins and wept in his self-realization, â€Å"even that enemy of immortal and man had friends and associates in his desolation, I am alone” (218). We find the sympathy to exempt the unfortun ate monster for the fear that perhaps, enlightenment forbid, one day we would end up alone. Works Cited Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ed. Karen Karbiener. New York: Barnes & august Classics, 2003. ?? ?? ?? ?? Show preview only The supra preview is unformatted text This student write piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.\r\n'