Internet and Politics - Despotic Regimes and Internet Censorship :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers

The Internet is impossible to censor, right? Not if you are a despotic regime throwing all your resources into it. You wont stop everyone and everything, but if the aim is to anticipate enough citizens from getting free run-in to topple your regime, then you lavatory succeed. For a start, flock orduret access the Internet using just brainwaves. They subscribe to a com attributeer connected to a wired or radiocommunication phone line. Stopping someone getting access to that, and you stop their Internet. close to countries ruled by authoritarian regimes are poor and have woeful telephone penetration. There are fewer than nine phone lines per gibibyte people in China, and three in Vietnam. It is pretty obvious that inappropriate people in democratic nations, few Vietnamese or Chinese place walk into their study room and log on. Some bureau workers might have access at work, but someone forget likely walk past as they are surfing. The majority of the cosmos must go to Int ernet cafs. It was at an Internet caf in capital of Vietnam that Vietnamese Internet dissident Le Chi Quang was caught by the inscrutable police in February 2002, after the state-owned Internet backbone company file transfer protocol spotted Quang, who had posted an article criticising capital of Vietnams secret donating of land near the modelling to appease the Chinese regime. In June that year, the regime told all Internet caf owners to tale on customers accessing blocked sites. The same thing happened in the South. In Saigon in March 2003, state activist Dr Nguyen Dan Que, a Nobel Peace Prize nominee, was caught, once once again at an Internet caf. Both Quang and Que are presently in prison. yet if every household had a telephone and everyone had a com drawer, free wrangle could still be blocked. Because the Internet backbones in these countries are controlled by the communist Parties, it is quite easy for them to block sites. As the Nets secret police put on more and m ore filters, Net-literate dissidents find more and more ship give the axeal to work around them. But as all this goes on, it gets harder and harder for less Net-literate people to play the game. The effect, then, is that only a small minority of the population can get around the authorities. And revolutions cannot be started and maintained by small minorities. For body politic to be built up in these countries, millions of their ordinary citizens must be able to be exposed in their daily life to concepts of commonwealth and freedom.Internet and Politics - Despotic Regimes and Internet Censorship Exploratory Essays look for PapersThe Internet is impossible to censor, right? Not if you are a despotic regime throwing all your resources into it. You wont stop everyone and everything, but if the aim is to check enough citizens from getting free speech to topple your regime, then you can succeed. For a start, people cant access the Internet using just brainwaves. They deal a com puter connected to a wired or radiocommunication phone line. Stopping someone getting access to that, and you stop their Internet. or so countries ruled by authoritarian regimes are poor and have minuscule telephone penetration. There are fewer than nine phone lines per grand piano people in China, and three in Vietnam. It is pretty obvious that opposed people in democratic nations, few Vietnamese or Chinese can walk into their study room and log on. Some state of affairs workers might have access at work, but someone pull up stakes likely walk past as they are surfing. The majority of the population must go to Internet cafs. It was at an Internet caf in Hanoi that Vietnamese Internet dissident Le Chi Quang was caught by the secret police in February 2002, after the state-owned Internet backbone company file transfer protocol spotted Quang, who had posted an article criticising Hanois secret donating of land near the frame in to appease the Chinese regime. In June that year, the regime told all Internet caf owners to hatch on customers accessing blocked sites. The same thing happened in the South. In Saigon in March 2003, country activist Dr Nguyen Dan Que, a Nobel Peace Prize nominee, was caught, again at an Internet caf. Both Quang and Que are presently in prison. charge if every household had a telephone and everyone had a computer, free speech could still be blocked. Because the Internet backbones in these countries are controlled by the communist Parties, it is quite easy for them to block sites. As the Nets secret police put on more and more filters, Net-literate dissidents find more and more shipway to work around them. But as all this goes on, it gets harder and harder for less Net-literate people to play the game. The effect, then, is that only a small minority of the population can get around the authorities. And revolutions cannot be started and maintained by small minorities. For democracy to be built up in these countries, millions of their ordinary citizens must be able to be exposed in their daily life to concepts of democracy and freedom.